PRESS RELEASE | U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) and U.S. Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ), Ranking Member of the Foreign Relations Committee, today warned the Maduro regime in Venezuela that its upcoming snap election would be considered illegitimate if it failed to meet basic established standards, and called for free and fair election for the Venezuelan people.
“The Venezuelan government under President Maduro has taken a series of repressive and undemocratic actions that threatens its own people and has isolated it from the world. It has called a snap election to maintain its grip on power, using food rationing to influence votes during a period of severe food shortages and widespread malnutrition.
“We call on President Maduro and his government to delay the election at least six months to allow for a legitimate campaign and an electoral process that meets established international standards. In order to ensure minimum standards for free and fair elections, President Maduro must also release all political prisoners, including opposition leader Leopoldo Lopez and American citizen Josh Holt; allow all candidates and political parties to participate in the election; reform Venezuela’s discredited election commission; halt the despicable practice of tying food rations to votes; allow accredited international election monitors access to all phases of the election process; and fully reinstate the democratically-elected National Assembly. Quite simply, President Maduro should have the courage and decency to allow the Venezuelan people the same fair and open process afforded Hugo Chavez when he first won at the ballot box.
“The United States can also do more to help the people of Venezuela in moving their country back toward democracy and the rule of law. That is why we will be introducing bipartisan legislation in the coming days that represents a much-needed comprehensive approach to Venezuela’s political, economic, and humanitarian crisis.”
In February, Durbin and Menendez led a group of ten Democratic senators in introducing a resolution condemning repressive and undemocratic actions taken by the Venezuelan government, and calling for free and fair elections for its people.
In 2017, the senators introduced bipartisan legislation, the Venezuela Humanitarian Assistance and Defense of Democratic Governance Act, which directs the State Department to work through nongovernmental organizations to provide public health commodities, basic food commodities, and related technical assistance to Venezuela.
In 2014, Menendez introduced the Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Act, which became law.
Trump: “I’ll be signing something” to “keep families together”
President Trump says he will sign an executive order this Wednesday afternoon ending family separation at the U.S.-Mexico border.
Justice Department officials working on executive action to end immigrant family separation of children at border “We still have to maintain toughness or our country will be overrun by people, by crime, by all of the things that we don’t stand for and that we don’t want,” Mr. Trump said during a Wednesday meeting with members of Congress at the White House. “So I’m going to be signing an executive order in a little while before I go to Minnesota. But at the same time I think you have to understand we are keeping families together, but we have to keep our borders strong.”
He called the measure “somewhat preemptive” but called on Congress to work towards a more permanent fix on the issue, saying that perhaps a more comprehensive immigration reform bill– one that may tackle the family separation issue, while also addressing security concerns, etc.– may be possible.
“Beyond this one problem of immigration— you can mention the word ‘comprehensive’ or you don’t have to use it,” Mr. Trump said. “A lot of politicians don’t like the word ‘comprehensive immigration reform,’ but I really think we have an opportunity to do the whole immigration picture and that’s what I’m looking to do ultimately. But right now we want to fix this problem and I think we’ll be able to do that.”
With this, he also called on Democrats for support.
“They really would like to have open borders where they can just flow in,” Mr. Trump said of congressional Democrats.
Family separation has seen a recent uptick due to Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ “zero-tolerance” policy for illegal entry at the U.S.-Mexico border. Because any illegal border crossing is prosecuted, parents and children are separated during the legal process.
The president said child smugglers, which he cited as a major reason behind that parent-child separation policy Tuesday, “use these children as passports to get into the country.”
Addressing Mr. Trump, Vice President Mike Pence spoke publicly on the issue for the first time at the meeting, ultimately echoing Mr. Trump’s call for Congress to address family separation by a more permanent means.
“We don’t want families to be separated,” Pence said. “We don’t want children taken away from parents, but right now under the law, as we sit with these law makers, we only have two choices before us: number one, don’t prosecute people who come into our country illegally. Or, prosecute them and then under court cases and the law, they have to be separated from their children.”
Secretary Treasury Steve Mnuchin, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo were present at the White House meeting as well.
Mr. Trump also announced that he will be cancelling the congressional picnic Thursday, saying that it “didn’t feel right” to host the gathering while lawmakers and the administration work towards a solution on immigraiton.
“We want to solve this immigration problem,” Mr. Trump said.
This meeting marks Mr. Trump’s second meeting with Congress this week, following his meeting with House GOP members Tuesday, in the midst of a backlash over the separation of immigrant children from their parents who enter the country illegally through the southern border.
South Africa votes to seize land without compensation
New South African President Cyril Ramaphosa called for it in his response to the State of the Nation Address. Now, South Africa is one step closer to taking the land of White farmers without compensation. By a vote of 241 to 83, the Parliament moved to amend the constitution to allow the process to move forward.
The proposal was brought forward by Julius Malema, a leader of the radical Marxist Economic Freedom Fighters. It was supported by President Cyril Ramaphosa and his African Nation Congress (ANC) party. They point to historic injustice to justify the move. Although the percentage of arable land owned by non-Whites in South Africa has grown since the end of Apartheid, Whites still own more than two-thirds of the arable land. Malema put it bluntly, “the time for reconciliation is over.”
Amending the constitution will take some time, but could be completed before the end of the year. If the proposal does pass, it will almost certainly be disastrous for South Africa. Based on Zimbabwe’s “fast track” land reforms as well as nearly every other instance Marxism-inspired property theft, there is every reason to expect agricultural output will plummet. Famine will follow. Additionally, the racial motivations behind the program will likely inspire even greater ethnic tensions and violence.
South African President calls for uncompensated land redistribution
Cyril Ramaphosa recently became president of South Africa after his predecessor was removed from office for corruption. In one of his first public addresses as president, Ramaphosa laid out his vision for South Africa in his response to the State of the Nation Address (SONA). He mentioned many initiatives for helping the poor of South Africa, and preventing violence against women and children.
While most of his response to the State of the Nation focused on social justice and consensus-building, one proposal was very worrying. Ramaphosa called for the “expropriation of land without compensation” to help with the redistribution of land to “Black South Africans.” He stressed that while this was one proposal that was being considered, it would be implemented in a way that would “promote agricultural production.” This would just be one element in a much larger economic development program.
The president went on to say that they would “not make the mistakes that other have made.” This was clearly a reference to Zimbabwe, which famously “redistributed” the land of white farmers with disastrous results. The former president of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe, “fast tracked” land reform starting in 2000. Nearly all the commercial farms were shut down. As a result, agricultural production dropped off dramatically. Famine and economic collapse quickly followed.
It is unclear how Ramaphosa will avoid the same fate as Zimbabwe. His claim that he would not allow “smash and grab interventions” which were the hallmark of the Zimbabwe program. But even without the violence, the Zimbabwean scheme would have been economically devastating. Not only does uncompensated expropriation have short-term consequences for those who have had their property stolen, government-sanctioned theft invariably slows foreign investment and domestic economic development. Who would invest in a property knowing it might be taken away at any moment?
You can watch the full speech below.
Announcements1 week ago
Springfield communities host National Night Out events
Local3 days ago
11th Street extension finally open
Illinois Govt4 days ago
Rep. Jimenez’s Legislation to Move State Jobs Back to the Capital City Signed into Law
Entertainment7 days ago
Illinois DNR taking applications for archery hunting on private land
Education1 week ago
Illinois is not among the states offering a “back-to-school” sales tax holiday
Sports5 days ago
Tax exemption for pro sports leagues targeted in new federal legislation
News7 days ago
Facebook is being accused of asking big banks for financial information
Finance5 days ago
Budget Director McCarty delivers good news to city council