Connect with us

Education

District 186 unveils Phase One of “Our Schools, Our Future” master plan

Thomas Clatterbuck

Published

on

proposed improvements to SHS

The “Our Schools, Our Future” plan took another step forward with the release of the Master Plan document. “Our Schools, Our Future” is the comprehensive facilities plan for District 186. Complied over years of research and nine community engagement events, this plan lays out a long-range vision for the district’s buildings and campuses.

After reviewing the feedback from last’s years community engagement events, the district has released the Phase 1 for implementing their vision. The plan lists proposed improvements at 33 district facilities over the next ten to twelve years. Some of the changes are small. Enos Elementary was allocated just $41,000 for security upgrades. But most of the improvements are quite substantial. Schools like Fairview Elementary and Washington Middle School are being expanded to replace the modular classrooms that they currently rely on. Springfield High and Lanphier High Schools are both slated for “comprehensive reconstruction.” The high school projects will cost over $40 million each. In total, there are more than $190 million in planned improvements around the district.

How will it be paid for?

The district is looking at a number of ways of paying for these projects. Some of it can be covered by “Health Life Safety” (HLS) funding. HLS funds can only be used for specific projects; typically those necessary for the safety of students and faculty. But the district is really pinning their hopes on the proposed sales tax increase. Districts in Sangamon County have called for a one percent sales tax increase to be used for facilities improvements. Money raised from the tax will be distributed to districts in the county on a per capita basis. That question will be on the November ballot.

You can learn more about the “Our Schools, Our Future” plan and leave feedback on the district’s website, or click here to read the Phase One plan.

Print Page

Senior strategist, statehouse reporter and political correspondent for Springfield Daily. Graduate of District 117 and UIS. Thomas covers stories in both Morgan and Sangamon Counties, as well as statewide politics.

Education

LIVE | District 186 school board meeting January 22nd

Staff Contributor

Published

on

Follow along live with District 186’s school board meeting for January 22nd.

Continue Reading

Education

Illinois educators wary of bill to require metal detectors in every school

Avatar

Published

on

image from the Sentinel-Echo

A group of Illinois lawmakers are promoting legislation that would use a combination of state, local and federal funds to put metal detectors in every school in the state, but some school leaders say it’s simply not feasible.

State Rep. La Shawn Ford, D-Chicago, said students in schools should feel safe from gun violence when they’re learning. For that reason, the former teacher filed a bill that would require all public schools, K-12, have students walk through metal detectors everyday to get to class.

“Why is it that no one gets shot inside of Terminal 1 or Terminal 2 at O’Hare Airport?” he asked.

The bill would tap into federal funds made available this summer to partially pay for the walk-through detectors, which can cost thousands of dollars.

Regional Superintendent Mark Jontry, who oversees schools in DeWitt, Livingston, Logan and McLean Counties, said the idea is well-intentioned, but would result in a unfunded expenses for school districts and create logistical problems.

“Who’s going to be responsible for doing those screenings? Are districts going to be responsible for the cost of hiring additional personnel?” he said. “The concept, on the surface may seem like a good idea, but it presents a number of challenges once you dig into it.”

The detectors would have to be run by a trained professional and need regular servicing and calibration to ensure they work properly. Jontry said such costs would likely fall to local taxpayers.

Ben Schwarm, deputy director with the Illinois Association of School Boards, served on a working group with the Illinois Terrorism Task Force. The law enforcement contingent of the group had a hierarchy of actions that could be taken to “harden” schools from unwanted entry. Schwarm said metal detectors were last on that list.

“It’s just not that effective,” he said. “There’s a thousand things school districts should be doing before they get to that point.”

Article by Cole Lauterbach with Illinois News Network. For more INN News visit ILnews.org

Continue Reading

Education

Illinois unveiling a new model of accountability to divvy up federal money for schools

Avatar

Published

on

Illinois’ education officials are set to unveil new metrics that will decide how much local school districts could receive in federal school improvement funds.

Using the new support and accountability model that’s planned to be released at the end of the month, schools that are struggling could receive $150,000 in Title I federal funds for school improvement, plus additional funds based on enrollment and state and local funding levels in the current school year. Some of those funds would have already been distributed earlier this year, officials said.

Rae Clementz, ISBE’s Director of Assessment and Accountability, said the new accountability and support metrics will provide insight for school officials and the public.

“It helps us depict a better, richer picture of the many ways in which schools are doing wonderful things,” she said.

Much of the new accountability and support model will be based on student data gleaned from PARCC, the acronym for Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers. Officials said that, while the test was not going to be conducted, the content would still be delivered and used to measure growth via an Illinois assessment of readiness.

PARCC received criticism from parents and administrators alike for long periods of testing.

One statistic that’s going to be factored in is chronic absenteeism, which measures students missing class for any reason, not just truancy.

“Chronic absenteeism highlights students that may otherwise go unnoticed in average attendance,” Clementz said.

Absenteeism figures will be higher than chronic truancy, which only measures unexcused absences. In the 2015 school year, the most recent year for which data was available, 335,094 Illinois students missed at least 10 percent of their school days. This is what advocacy group Attendance Works classifies as “chronically absent.”

Patrick Payne, director of Data Strategies and Analytics with ISBE said there will also be new information on teacher quality released, measuring certain credentials and “the number of inexperienced teachers.”

The new measurements will not affect the state’s school funding formula that went into effect this year.

Article by Cole Lauterbach with Illinois News Network. For more INN News visit ILnews.org

Continue Reading

Sponsored Ad

Sponsored

Trending